Test Case |
Goals / Plan |
Time to generate |
test1.fct : planner has to do full navigation. GOTO are possible only between visibles and near waypoints. Goals:
|
||
File : test1.fct with EHC* |
non-solvable in raisonnable resources (memory) |
5 min 520MB allowed |
File : test1.fct without EHC* |
0: GOTO STARTPLACE REGISTRATION 1: REGISTER REGISTRATION 2: GOTO REGISTRATION FRONTROOM_1 3: GOTO FRONTROOM_1 FRONTROOM_2 4: GOTO FRONTROOM_2 STANDROOM_2 5: WAIT-PRES-SESSION PRESSESSION1 6: MAKE-PRESENTATION STANDROOM_2 PRESSESSION1 |
0.42 s |
Generaly
Enforced Hill-Climbing (EHC) should improve planning result. In above
case, we get totally the opposite. We belive that it because the
planner has no heuristic for navigation. So, EHC lost its time...
|
||
test1_nav.fct
: this is the same problem as test1.fct except that here, the planner
don't have to do full navigation. GOTO are possible for every pair of
waypoints. |
||
File : test1_nav.fct with EHC* |
0: GOTO STARTPLACE REGISTRATION 1: REGISTER REGISTRATION 2: GOTO REGISTRATION STANDROOM_2 3: WAIT-PRES-SESSION PRESSESSION1 4: MAKE-PRESENTATION STANDROOM_2 PRESSESSION1 |
0.52 s |
File : test1_nav.fct without EHC* |
0: GOTO STARTPLACE REGISTRATION 1: REGISTER REGISTRATION 2: GOTO REGISTRATION STANDROOM_2 3: WAIT-PRES-SESSION PRESSESSION1 4: MAKE-PRESENTATION STANDROOM_2 PRESSESSION1 |
5.32 s |
This test seems to be better. Both plans are the same. If we compare with test1.fct, we remark that the plan are equivalents. {GOTO REGISTRATION STANDROOM_2} can be discomposed in {GOTO REGISTRATION FRONTROOM_1, GOTO FRONTROOM_1 FRONTROOM_2, GOTO FRONTROOM_2 STANDROOM_2}.
|
||
Goals :
|
||
File : test2.fct with EHC |
0: GOTO STARTPLACE WP_0 1: GOTO WP_0 FRONTROOM_1 2: GOTO FRONTROOM_1 REGISTRATION 3: REGISTER REGISTRATION 4: GOTO REGISTRATION FRONTROOM_1 5: GOTO FRONTROOM_1 STANDROOM_1 6: WAIT-PRES-SESSION PRESSESSION0 7: MAKE-PRESENTATION STANDROOM_1 PRESSESSION0 8: GOTO STANDROOM_1 FRONTROOM_1 9: GOTO FRONTROOM_1 FRONTROOM_2 10: GOTO FRONTROOM_2 FRONTROOM_3 11: GOTO FRONTROOM_3 SEATSROOM_3 12: WAIT-PRES-SESSION PRESSESSION1 13: ASSIST-PRESENTATION SEATSROOM_3 PRESSESSION1 14: GOTO SEATSROOM_3 FRONTROOM_3 15: GOTO FRONTROOM_3 FRONTROOM_2 16: GOTO FRONTROOM_2 FRONTROOM_1 17: GOTO FRONTROOM_1 SEATSROOM_1 18: WAIT-PRES-SESSION PRESSESSION5 19: ASSIST-PRESENTATION SEATSROOM_1 PRESSESSION5 |
26.40 s |
File : test2.fct without EHC |
0: GOTO STARTPLACE REGISTRATION 1: REGISTER REGISTRATION 2: GOTO REGISTRATION FRONTROOM_1 3: GOTO FRONTROOM_1 STANDROOM_1 4: WAIT-PRES-SESSION PRESSESSION0 5: MAKE-PRESENTATION STANDROOM_1 PRESSESSION0 6: GOTO STANDROOM_1 FRONTROOM_1 7: GOTO FRONTROOM_1 FRONTROOM_2 8: GOTO FRONTROOM_2 FRONTROOM_3 9: GOTO FRONTROOM_3 SEATSROOM_3 10: WAIT-PRES-SESSION PRESSESSION1 11: ASSIST-PRESENTATION SEATSROOM_3 PRESSESSION1 12: GOTO SEATSROOM_3 FRONTROOM_3 13: GOTO FRONTROOM_3 FRONTROOM_2 14: GOTO FRONTROOM_2 FRONTROOM_1 15: GOTO FRONTROOM_1 SEATSROOM_1 16: WAIT-PRES-SESSION PRESSESSION5 17: ASSIST-PRESENTATION SEATSROOM_1 PRESSESSION5 |
1.97 s |
Plans are not the same. EHC give a longer plan (more steps). But, it is surprising to see that EHC is slower than without EHC.
|
||
test2_nav.fct : the same test except that planner don't have to plan full navigation |
||
File : test2_nav.fct with EHC |
0: GOTO STARTPLACE REGISTRATION 1: REGISTER REGISTRATION 2: GOTO REGISTRATION STANDROOM_1 3: WAIT-PRES-SESSION PRESSESSION0 4: MAKE-PRESENTATION STANDROOM_1 PRESSESSION0 5: GOTO STANDROOM_1 SEATSROOM_3 6: WAIT-PRES-SESSION PRESSESSION1 7: ASSIST-PRESENTATION SEATSROOM_3 PRESSESSION1 8: GOTO SEATSROOM_3 SEATSROOM_1 9: WAIT-PRES-SESSION PRESSESSION5 10: ASSIST-PRESENTATION SEATSROOM_1 PRESSESSION5 |
11.87 s |
File : test2_nav.fct without EHC |
0: GOTO STARTPLACE REGISTRATION 1: REGISTER REGISTRATION 2: GOTO REGISTRATION STANDROOM_1 3: WAIT-PRES-SESSION PRESSESSION0 4: MAKE-PRESENTATION STANDROOM_1 PRESSESSION0 5: GOTO STANDROOM_1 SEATSROOM_3 6: WAIT-PRES-SESSION PRESSESSION1 7: ASSIST-PRESENTATION SEATSROOM_3 PRESSESSION1 8: GOTO SEATSROOM_3 SEATSROOM_1 9: WAIT-PRES-SESSION PRESSESSION5 10: ASSIST-PRESENTATION SEATSROOM_1 PRESSESSION5 |
7.97 s |
test3_nav.fct Goals :
|
||
with EHC |
0: GOTO STARTPLACE REGISTRATION 1: REGISTER REGISTRATION 2: GOTO REGISTRATION STANDROOM_2 3: WAIT-PRES-SESSION PRESSESSION0 4: MAKE-PRESENTATION STANDROOM_2 PRESSESSION0 5: GOTO STANDROOM_2 SEATSROOM_1 6: WAIT-PRES-SESSION PRESSESSION1 7: ASSIST-PRESENTATION SEATSROOM_1 PRESSESSION1 8: WAIT-POST-SESSION POSTERSESSION0 9: ASSIST-PRESENTATION SEATSROOM_1 PRESSESSION2 10: GOTO SEATSROOM_1 P10 11: WAIT-POST-SESSION POSTERSESSION1 12: TAKE-PICTURE-POSTER P10 POSTERSESSION1 13: GOTO P10 P3 14: FIX-POSTER P3 POSTERSESSION1 15: WAIT-PRES-SESSION PRESSESSION6 16: REMOVE-POSTER P3 POSTERSESSION1 |
29.79 s |
without EHC |
0: GOTO STARTPLACE REGISTRATION 1: REGISTER REGISTRATION 2: GOTO REGISTRATION STANDROOM_2 3: WAIT-PRES-SESSION PRESSESSION0 4: MAKE-PRESENTATION STANDROOM_2 PRESSESSION0 5: GOTO STANDROOM_2 SEATSROOM_1 6: WAIT-PRES-SESSION PRESSESSION1 7: ASSIST-PRESENTATION SEATSROOM_1 PRESSESSION1 8: WAIT-POST-SESSION POSTERSESSION0 9: ASSIST-PRESENTATION SEATSROOM_1 PRESSESSION2 10: GOTO SEATSROOM_1 P3 11: WAIT-POST-SESSION POSTERSESSION1 12: FIX-POSTER P3 POSTERSESSION1 13: GOTO P3 P10 14: WAIT-PRES-SESSION PRESSESSION6 15: TAKE-PICTURE-POSTER P10 POSTERSESSION1 16: GOTO P10 P3 17: REMOVE-POSTER P3 POSTERSESSION1 |
28.16 s |
test4_nav.fct Goals :
|
||
with EHC |
non-solvable in raisonnable resources (memory) | |
without EHC |
non-solvable in raisonnable resources (memory) | |
test5_nav.fct Goals :
|
||
with EHC |
non-solvable in raisonnable resources (memory) | |
without EHC |
non-solvable in raisonnable resources (memory) | |